Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglass Allen's avatar

I found this interview fascinating and, let me say it, weird! It's not just human talent, but a religious-like reformation the author appeals to and models with his own life choices. It seems like a techno version of the age of Aquarius! I'm of the flower children generation and happy that peace, love, harmony, and love of nature reaches so many via Mark Tercek's efforts. However, I have some misgivings which have made me no longer donate to my former favorite charity/environmental organization, The Nature Conservancy. I used to donate about half of my tithing (not for religious reasons, but to make a better world) to The Nature Conservancy, and I intended to leave them a much larger sum until around 2019, about when Tercek left, when the preservation and conservation organization I loved became another "climate justice" organization.

Nature Conservancy under its new chief scientist, Katherine Hayhoe, substituted climate change as the central organizing principle, downgrading the original focus of preserving important habitats. My formative years as a young conservationist who loved nature and its creatures, and went on to major in biology and do graduate biology work, cherished this widely shared mantra- habitat, habitat, habitat. Nature Conservancy was abandoning that. Every mailing I got from them promoted consensus science and climate crisis. They were adding their esteemed voice to what I had experienced as a toxic turning away from the realism, pragmatism, civility, and scientific method under previous Nature Conservancy chief scientist Peter Kareiva. Nature Conservancy was now aligned with Al Gore, Michael Mann. and climate activists responsible for Judith Curry, Roger Pielke, and many others being demonized, and even losing their tenured employment. I was retired and teaching an Osher Life Long Learning class in climate science. I witnessed the promotion of models over data, unrealistic energy policy over what would actually reduce emissions, and a Manichaean view that easily fit our hot button issue culture wars.

I find Nature Conservancy’s attempt to be relevant, somewhat like the IPCC’s, was a tragic mis-step, a tragic mis-direction. I want to contribute to and promote the Nature Conservancy I loved all those decades. It’s with sadness that I write these words.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?